• Welcome Purple People

    To me Purple People are those of us who are neither Republican Red nor Democrat Blue; we find ourselves in between. The internet often represents those on the far left or the far right; this site is for those of us in the middle.

    Since there are a variety of non-conformists that consider themselves Independents, here's a clarification. The point of view of this blog is basically Realist/Libertarian light...

    -Pro Small Government, bureaucracies tend to be wasteful and inefficient.

    -Government should not be the morality police.

    -Less waste, lower taxes. Taxes are okay if spent wisely. Roads and schools need funding. Be smart with my money and I won't complain.

    -Government shouldn't babysit adults. Help kids and assist people who have serious problems, but stop trying to protect everyone from themselves.

    -Foreign policy should be conducted by people with brains and experience. Think, don't be reckless and don't be politically motivated. Remember that the U.S. is not the only country in the world.

    -Tone down the rhetoric and remember your manners. Play nicely and don't belittle people who disagree with you.

    Moderates Also Welcomed
  • Archives

Palin Craziness

I’m disturbed by the way people have reacted to Governor Palin.  There is no middle ground, she’s either heroine of devil.  I doubt either is true.  Will she be the red state conservative, or will she be the gentle mother of a disabled child we all empathize with - either, both, I have no idea. 

I like that when the media put the screws to her she performed, but that doesn’t mean she automatically gets my vote next election.  The media’s coverage of Governor Palin has been absurd.  I’ve never seen a male candidate have to defend his parenthood or defend the way he dresses; they should be ashamed of their blantant BS, but I know they’re not.  So I say ‘let it ride’ this political/media BS will pass, then we can decide on Governor Palin on her resume, the same thing most of us have to qualify on.  Forget the clothes, forget the rumors, forget the nastiness, let’s remember the basics; what are the true qualities we look for, not the garbage the media tells us to look at. 

Good Luck Governor Palin; tell me why I should vote for you next election…

The McCain’s Letter to Supporters

Cindy and I would like to take a moment to thank you for your loyal and steadfast support during the course of this campaign. Governor Palin, her husband Todd, our families, friends and campaign staff extend our deep appreciation for your tireless dedication, support and friendship.

It is the end of a long journey and your support through the ups and downs has meant more to us than you may ever know.

Although we were disappointed with the results, we must move beyond this campaign and work together to get our country moving again.

It is our sincere hope that you will join us in putting our country first and continue to work to keep our nation safe, free and prosperous.

We urge you to join us in not just congratulating Senator Obama, but offering our next president our good will and earnest effort to find ways to come together as a nation. Whatever our differences may be, we are all fellow Americans.

We are truly blessed to live in this great country and call ourselves Americans, and we will forever be her loyal servants.

Today, let there be no reason now for any American to fail to cherish their citizenship in this, the greatest nation on Earth.

With warm gratitude,

Cindy and John McCain

Other Disappointments…

No surprise, though disappointing, Harry Reid is stating that Senator Lieberman may be out as the head of Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee.  We can only hope for more politicians like Senator Liebermen to emerge who follow their convictions instead of their party when making decisions.  Senator Lieberman had to know his political career would likely take a hit for his support of Senator McCain, he did anyway, and he did it graciously with a smile and good humor.

The other big disappointment of this election is that Representative Christopher Shays lost his seat in Connecticut.  There are no Republicans representatives in New England anymore.  Mr. Shays is as moderate a Republican as they come.  He’s been critical of his own party at times and broken with his party on issues like the environment and campaign finance reform.  His loss shows clearly that this was simply the Democrats year, as one of the good ones lost his seat in the process.

Thank You PPV Readers

A big thank you to the readers and commentors of Purple People Vote.  It has been a thrill to write political articles that people actually have some interest in reading.  My support of Senator McCain along with development of this blog was completely unexpectected.  However, it was an excellent experience even though the outcome was not the one I wanted.  Purple People Vote will continue, though it may experience a short term lull as I could use a little political break.  Can’t say exactly what form it will take, but I’ll comtinue to provide my prespective as an Independent and a moderate.  Again Thank You!

Congratulations Senator Obama


Union Leader Endorses McCain

McCain for President: A real leader for America

“Wednesday, Oct. 15, 2008

In this time of great uncertainty, America needs an experienced, decisive leader with clear vision and a steady hand to guide us through. That man is Sen. John McCain.

The troubles that will face the next President of the United States are numerous and perilous. They will test the character, the resolve and the mettle of the man we choose to deal with them. Of the two men who stand on the precipice of that great office, only John McCain has proved that he has what it takes to make the tough decisions in a time of crisis.
Editorial logo
Click for Editorials & Op-Eds

Weeks ago, when the credit markets began to freeze and swift action was needed from Washington, Barack Obama took the weekend to think about it. John McCain suspended his campaign and flew back to Washington to work out a solution.

Two years ago, when warning signs were flashing red that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were in serious financial danger, John McCain called for their reform and co-sponsored a bill designed to prevent them from destabilizing the whole economy. Barack Obama did nothing.

Even before President Bush hired Gen. David Petraeus to turn around the war in Iraq, John McCain warned that we needed more troops on the ground. He was an immediate and vocal advocate of Gen. Petraeus’ surge strategy, which turned a “lost” war into what increasingly looks like a victory. Barack Obama opposed it and advocated withdrawal.

For the last two decades, whenever Washington went on a spending spree it couldn’t afford, John McCain stood in defiant opposition. Even if the spenders were members of his own party, he called them out. In only a few short years, Barack Obama has become a master distributor of pork and an opponent of controlling runaway spending. He even voted against defunding the Bridge to Nowhere and using the money for Hurricane Katrina relief.

Barack Obama’s call for “change” has a certain appeal, to be sure. But this is no time to be rolling the dice on an untested leader whose rhetoric doesn’t match his record when it comes to delivering actual change. John McCain has a long history of standing up to Washington’s permanent political class, regardless of party, and pushing for institutional reforms to end business as usual. He is the right leader to restore trust in our government, confidence to our markets and prosperity to our country. On Nov. 4, do right by your country and vote for John McCain for President.”

Obama Camps Tax Levels Moves Lower Again

From Fox News the tax bracket for the Obama campaign is apparently a moving target.

How Low Can It Go? Richardson Pegs Middle Class as Those Making Under $120,000

For the second time in a week, a prominent Democrat has downgraded Barack Obama’s definition of the middle class — leading Republicans to question whether he’ll stick to his promise not to raise taxes on anyone making under $250,000.

The latest hiccup in the campaign message came Friday morning on KOA-AM, when New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson pegged the middle class as those making $120,000 and under.

Click here to listen to Richardson talk about Obama’s tax plan.

“What Obama wants to do is he is basically looking at $120,000 and under among those that are in the middle class, and there is a tax cut for those,” Richardson said in the interview, according to a clip posted on YouTube.

There’s no indication that Obama has changed his tax policy, which states that anyone making under $200,000 would get a tax cut under his administration, and nobody making under $250,000 would be hit with a tax increase. Richardson actually recited that part of Obama’s plan correctly earlier in his radio interview.

Taxpayer’s Selfishness

John McCain’s Weekly Radio Address

“Good morning, this is John McCain, speaking to you just 72 hours before the time for choosing.

Presidential elections have a way of settling on a few great questions as the moment of decision arrives, and this has happened in the closing days of the election of 2008.

We’ve learned that Barack Obama’s economic plan for America to redistribute the wealth of America with higher taxes. It took a working man in Ohio to finally get him to explain his economic plan in plain language. Senator Obama wants to “spread the wealth around.” He thinks that your job is to earn wealth, and the government’s job is to spread it.

I reject the ideology of redistributing wealth, and I always have. I believe that the only way to pull our economy out of this terrible time of worry and hardship is to spread opportunity. Low taxes reward effort and create jobs. We’re going to double the child deduction for working families. We will cut the capital gains tax. And we will cut business taxes to help create jobs, and keep American business in America.

At the same time, I’m going to make government finally live on a budget, just like you do, and I am going to enforce that discipline by the power of veto.

My fellow Americans, we’re going to get through this present economic crisis. And we will even come out stronger — without the corruption and arrogance that have overtaken both Washington and Wall Street. We’re going to pull through these hard times — and do it together, just as our country has done before.

And when that day arrives, we will find awaiting our country all of the same great challenges and dangers that were there all along. At a time when the jobs and financial security of our people seem at risk, it is hard to spare much thought even for the great and abiding concerns of this nation’s security, and the security of our friends and allies across the world. But these dangers have not gone away while we turned our attention elsewhere. And the next president will meet no greater test than defending America from these threats.

Victory must still be secured, in Iraq and Afghanistan. Senator Obama opposed removing the dictator in Iraq, and now obstinately opposes the need to defend the young democracy in that country — even with victory so clearly in sight. He cites as his most courageous moment in public life a speech he gave in 2002 — against a war resolution on which he had no vote, on a matter of national security for which he bore no responsibility. He hopes you will forget the votes he cast when he actually did have responsibility, his votes to prevent the strategy that is leading to victory, and to deny funding for the troops who are gaining that victory. And now he hopes that in the cloud of crisis at home you will forget the stakes in Iraq — the disaster and tragedy that would follow if American forces leave in retreat.

With terrorists still plotting new strikes across the world, millions of innocent lives are still at stake, including American lives. Our enemies’ violent ambitions must still be prevented — by American vigilance, by diplomacy and cooperation with our partners, and by force of arms as a last resort. In his four years in the Senate, two of them spent running for president, Barack Obama has displayed some impressive qualities. But the question is whether this is a man who has what it takes to protect America from Osama bin Laden, al Qaeda, the prospect of a nuclear-armed Iran, and other grave threats in the world. And he has given you no reason to answer in the affirmative.

At the same time, Democrats in Congress have already proposed to cut defense spending by 25 percent. Even with our troops engaged in two wars, and with a force in need of rebuilding, we’re getting a glimpse of what one-party rule would look like under Obama, Pelosi, and Reid. Apparently it starts with lowering our defenses and raising our taxes.

At least when European nations chose the path of higher taxes and cutting defense, they knew that their security would be guaranteed by America. But if America takes the same path, who will guarantee our security?

We have passed through a difficult time, and more courage will be needed in the years ahead. But there is a direction to events, and the sacrifices of the present have not been in vain.

We will build on our hard-won victories to extend the security of our nation and of every nation that seeks to live in freedom. We will not yield to intimidation, and by our strength we will prevent threats from turning into tragedies. This is America’s work in the world, as it always has been in our finest moments. We are called still to spread liberty, to assure justice, to be the makers of peace. And this is the great work I will carry on as your president and commander in chief.

To do all of this, my fellow Americans, I need your help. I need your confidence. And I am asking for your vote.

Thank you for listening.”

Obama’s ‘Selfish’ Comment

ABC reports that Senator Obama in rejecting the claim that his ’spread the wealth’ plan is socialistic called not wnating to pay higher taxes ’selfish’.

“John McCain and Sarah Palin they call this socialistic,” Obama continued. “You know I don’t know when, when they decided they wanted to make a virtue out of selfishness.”

It’s unclear if this was a nod to the Ayn Rand book “The Virtue of Selfishness,” with all that the invocation of Rand implies.

It would seem to be, given the themes of Rand’s work, what happens when independent achievers are demonized.

Which would fit with this description of those who want to keep their hard-earned tax dollars as “selfish.”

Atlas may not be shrugging, but Obama is.

This comment probably was not intended as a slam; however what it shows, is that Senator Obama doesn’t understand working Americans. People who don’t want to high taxes because of selfishness or greed in most cases, they don’t want to pay high taxes because the government has a history of being wasteful. People don’t want their money allocated via a contrived system of need. Americans are a very generous group of people; people give incredible amounts of money to charities of their own volition. Are some people greedy and selfish? Absolutely. However, there are numerous people who are good generous folks who simply want the government out of their pocketbook and out of their life as much as possible. Big government is no comfort to working tax paying Americans.